family=DM+Sans:wght@400;500;600display=swap" rel="stylesheet">
Team #73 · Sportsman · Timing-Based Team Analysis

Twomota
Racing Development

Warwick — Round 2
26 April 2026 6-Hour Endurance 1.03 km Circuit Warwick Kart Club Data: MYLAPS Speedhive
Finish Position
4th
of 10 teams · Sportsman
Best Lap
50.601s
Lap 37 · P7 in field
Total Laps
382
10 laps behind leader
Race Time
6:01:56
132 championship pts
Race Results

Overall Classification

Final race classification for SEKQLD Round 2 at Warwick. 10 teams contested the 6-hour endurance race. Twomota Racing Development finished 4th with 382 laps.

SEKQLD Round 2 final race classification
Pos#TeamTotal TimeLapsBest LapGap
1#66Force Phantom FASTEST LAP6:01:19.26239250.021s—
2#397CASA Racing6:01:52.50038550.410s7 laps
3#787ShapeCUT Racing6:01:46.45738251.234s10 laps
4#73Twomota Racing Development6:01:56.73038250.601s10 laps
5#00Adrenalin Sports6:01:33.44038150.698s11 laps
6#64Alpha Racing Team6:02:05.66937050.525s22 laps
7#3Team Fange6:01:30.41036751.889s25 laps
8#95Project 5FIVE36:02:03.50635150.438s41 laps
9#42GF Motorsports6:02:02.64834750.110s45 laps
10#49BR Motorsport6:01:57.56025950.068s133 laps
Pre-Race Pace

Sunday Practice

Round 2 ran without a separate qualifying session, so Sunday morning's practice is the closest read on relative pace heading into the race. Twomota Racing Development sat P8 on the practice timing sheet.

SEKQLD Round 2 Sunday practice timing
Pos#TeamClassLapsBest LapGap
1#66Force PhantomMaxx3350.333s—
2#49BR MotorsportSportsman1350.875s+00.542s
3#95Project 5FIVE3Maxx2551.236s+00.903s
4#64Alpha Racing TeamMaxx3151.470s+01.137s
5#00Adrenalin SportsSportsman2751.626s+01.293s
6#42GF MotorsportsMaxx2151.758s+01.425s
7#397CASA RacingSportsman2251.825s+01.492s
8#73Twomota Racing DevelopmentSportsman1852.569s+02.236s
9#787ShapeCUT RacingMaxx1052.836s+02.503s
10#3Team FangSportsman1454.607s+04.274s
Pace Analysis

Pace Profile

Comparing each team's fastest single lap against their estimated average lap time. A smaller gap between best and average indicates more consistent pace throughout the 6-hour race.

#73 Twomota Racing Development
50.601s
56.850s
#66 Force Phantom
50.021s
55.304s
#49 BR Motorsport
50.068s
83.852s
#42 GF Motorsports
50.110s
62.601s
#397 CASA Racing
50.410s
56.396s
#95 Project 5FIVE3
50.438s
61.890s
#64 Alpha Racing Team
50.525s
58.718s
#00 Adrenalin Sports
50.698s
56.938s
#787 ShapeCUT Racing
51.234s
56.823s
#3 Team Fange
51.889s
59.102s
Best Lap Estimated Average Lap
Insights

Key Takeaways

Timing-based insights for Twomota Racing Development inferred from public Rd 2 practice, race, and points data.

🔼
Gained 4 Positions
Practice pace ranked Twomota Racing Development P8; the team finished P4 after six hours of racing — turning practice form into race-day position gains.
⚡
P7 Best Lap
Best lap of 50.601s ranked P7 of 10 for outright single-lap pace.
📊
Consistency: P5
Gap between best and estimated average lap: 6.25s. Ranked 5th of 10 teams for race consistency. Lower gap = fewer disruptions and steadier pace.
🏆
132 Championship Points
Sitting P4 in the Round 2 standings (132 race points). Class: Sportsman.
Timing-Based Read

Data-Inferred Report

This page is inferred from public timing only. Without pit-stop, driver, fuel, or incident logs, the notes below describe likely race patterns rather than confirmed team decisions.

High-confidence timing read: Twomota Racing Development converted P8 practice pace into a P4 finish — gaining 4 positions. Endurance position gains over a 6-hour race almost always come from cleaner stints, not raw outright pace.

Practice → Flag
P8 → P4
Gained 4 places between Sunday practice and the chequered flag.
Consistency Rank
P5
6.25s separated best from estimated average lap — ranked 5th of 10 teams.
Best-Lap Rank
P7
Best lap of 50.601s, 7th fastest of 10 entries on outright pace.
🧭
Recovery / Maintenance
Twomota Racing Development's P4 finish reads as a maintenance race rather than a podium chase. Lap-time peaks (P7) and consistency (P5) sat away from the leader's combination.
⏱️
Outright Lap-Time Window
Best lap of 50.601s on lap 37 sits 7th in the field. With 10 teams scoring an estimated average lap, Twomota Racing Development ranks P4 on long-run pace.
📊
Stint Steadiness
Estimated average lap of 56.850s implies 6.25s of slip from peak to typical lap. P5 consistency rank — inside the top half of the field.
🔢
Lap Count Read
Total laps: 382. 10 laps off the leader. Lap-count gaps in 6-hour racing are a stronger predictor of result than headline best-lap times.
Field Comparison

Where The Result Landed

The timing data does not expose pit strategy or traffic context, but it does show where Twomota Racing Development sat against the field around them on race day.

🥈
Vs ShapeCUT Racing
ShapeCUT Racing finished P3 on 382 laps, 0 laps ahead. Best laps: 51.234s vs Twomota Racing Development's 50.601s. The classification gap is the cleanest read on race-day separation.
🎯
Vs Race Leader (#66)
Race winner Force Phantom finished 10 laps ahead with a best lap of 50.021s. Twomota Racing Development's best of 50.601s ranks P7 of 10 on outright single-lap pace.
🛡️
Sportsman Class P2
P2 of 5 in the Sportsman class. Class winner: CASA Racing (385 laps). Closing the class gap is the next-round target.
📊
Championship P9
Round 2 added 132 race points; sitting P9 in the SEKQLD 2026 championship with 132 total after two rounds.
Inference Limits

Likely Race Shape

The public dataset supports a strong read on Twomota Racing Development's pace profile, but not the exact operational choices behind it.

🔄
Disruption-Heavy Profile
A 6.25s gap between best and estimated average lap suggests multiple long pit windows, drive-throughs, or off-pace phases stretching the average. The timing trace doesn't decompose them, but the spread points at recurring slow phases.
📊
Mid-Field Race Shape
P5 consistency rank sits in the middle of the field. Some slow windows beyond the mandatory pit pattern, but no single dominant disruption stands out.
👀
What To Watch Next
Race-pace already inside the front-running group's window. Round 3 at Ipswich will hinge on shaving the secondary slow windows and tightening up pit choreography.
Round 2 Navigation

Round 2 Team Selector

Choose any team below to stay inside the Warwick round context and compare reports side by side. Use the round pills to jump back to Round 1.

#66 Force Phantom #787 ShapeCUT Racing #64 Alpha Racing Team #95 Project 5FIVE3 #42 GF Motorsports #397 CASA Racing #73 Twomota Racing Development #00 Adrenalin Sports #3 Team Fange #49 BR Motorsport
Round 2 Team Hub → Full Field Analysis → Detailed BR Race Report →