family=DM+Sans:wght@400;500;600display=swap" rel="stylesheet">
Team #95 · Maxx · Timing-Based Team Analysis

Project
5FIVE3

Warwick — Round 2
26 April 2026 6-Hour Endurance 1.03 km Circuit Warwick Kart Club Data: MYLAPS Speedhive
Finish Position
8th
of 10 teams · Maxx
Best Lap
50.438s
Lap 70 · P5 in field
Total Laps
351
41 laps behind leader
Race Time
6:02:03
119 championship pts
Race Results

Overall Classification

Final race classification for SEKQLD Round 2 at Warwick. 10 teams contested the 6-hour endurance race. Project 5FIVE3 finished 8th with 351 laps.

SEKQLD Round 2 final race classification
Pos#TeamTotal TimeLapsBest LapGap
1#66Force Phantom FASTEST LAP6:01:19.26239250.021s—
2#397CASA Racing6:01:52.50038550.410s7 laps
3#787ShapeCUT Racing6:01:46.45738251.234s10 laps
4#73Twomota Racing Development6:01:56.73038250.601s10 laps
5#00Adrenalin Sports6:01:33.44038150.698s11 laps
6#64Alpha Racing Team6:02:05.66937050.525s22 laps
7#3Team Fange6:01:30.41036751.889s25 laps
8#95Project 5FIVE36:02:03.50635150.438s41 laps
9#42GF Motorsports6:02:02.64834750.110s45 laps
10#49BR Motorsport6:01:57.56025950.068s133 laps
Pre-Race Pace

Sunday Practice

Round 2 ran without a separate qualifying session, so Sunday morning's practice is the closest read on relative pace heading into the race. Project 5FIVE3 sat P3 on the practice timing sheet.

SEKQLD Round 2 Sunday practice timing
Pos#TeamClassLapsBest LapGap
1#66Force PhantomMaxx3350.333s—
2#49BR MotorsportSportsman1350.875s+00.542s
3#95Project 5FIVE3Maxx2551.236s+00.903s
4#64Alpha Racing TeamMaxx3151.470s+01.137s
5#00Adrenalin SportsSportsman2751.626s+01.293s
6#42GF MotorsportsMaxx2151.758s+01.425s
7#397CASA RacingSportsman2251.825s+01.492s
8#73Twomota Racing DevelopmentSportsman1852.569s+02.236s
9#787ShapeCUT RacingMaxx1052.836s+02.503s
10#3Team FangSportsman1454.607s+04.274s
Pace Analysis

Pace Profile

Comparing each team's fastest single lap against their estimated average lap time. A smaller gap between best and average indicates more consistent pace throughout the 6-hour race.

#95 Project 5FIVE3
50.438s
61.890s
#66 Force Phantom
50.021s
55.304s
#49 BR Motorsport
50.068s
83.852s
#42 GF Motorsports
50.110s
62.601s
#397 CASA Racing
50.410s
56.396s
#64 Alpha Racing Team
50.525s
58.718s
#73 Twomota Racing Development
50.601s
56.850s
#00 Adrenalin Sports
50.698s
56.938s
#787 ShapeCUT Racing
51.234s
56.823s
#3 Team Fange
51.889s
59.102s
Best Lap Estimated Average Lap
Insights

Key Takeaways

Timing-based insights for Project 5FIVE3 inferred from public Rd 2 practice, race, and points data.

📉
Lost 5 Positions
Sat P3 on the Sunday practice sheet but finished P8. Endurance racing rewards consistency over outright practice pace.
⚡
P5 Best Lap
Best lap of 50.438s ranked P5 of 10 for outright single-lap pace.
📊
Consistency: P8
Gap between best and estimated average lap: 11.45s. Ranked 8th of 10 teams for race consistency. Lower gap = fewer disruptions and steadier pace.
🏆
119 Championship Points
Sitting P8 in the Round 2 standings (119 race points). Class: Maxx.
Timing-Based Read

Data-Inferred Report

This page is inferred from public timing only. Without pit-stop, driver, fuel, or incident logs, the notes below describe likely race patterns rather than confirmed team decisions.

High-confidence timing read: Project 5FIVE3 sat P3 on the practice sheet but finished P8. The drop suggests time lost in green-flag stints or stops that the public timing alone can't fully decompose.

Practice → Flag
P3 → P8
Dropped 5 places relative to where they sat in Sunday practice.
Consistency Rank
P8
11.45s separated best from estimated average lap — ranked 8th of 10 teams.
Best-Lap Rank
P5
Best lap of 50.438s, 5th fastest of 10 entries on outright pace.
🧭
Recovery / Maintenance
Project 5FIVE3's P8 finish reads as a maintenance race rather than a podium chase. Lap-time peaks (P5) and consistency (P8) sat away from the leader's combination.
⏱️
Outright Lap-Time Window
Best lap of 50.438s on lap 70 sits 5th in the field. With 10 teams scoring an estimated average lap, Project 5FIVE3 ranks P8 on long-run pace.
📊
Stint Steadiness
Estimated average lap of 61.890s implies 11.45s of slip from peak to typical lap. P8 consistency rank — outside the top half of the field.
🔢
Lap Count Read
Total laps: 351. 41 laps off the leader. Lap-count gaps in 6-hour racing are a stronger predictor of result than headline best-lap times.
Field Comparison

Race-Day Position

The timing data does not expose pit strategy or traffic context, but it does show where Project 5FIVE3 sat against the field around them on race day.

🥈
Vs Team Fange
Team Fange finished P7 on 367 laps, 16 laps ahead. Best laps: 51.889s vs Project 5FIVE3's 50.438s. The classification gap is the cleanest read on race-day separation.
🎯
Vs Race Leader (#66)
Race winner Force Phantom finished 41 laps ahead with a best lap of 50.021s. Project 5FIVE3's best of 50.438s ranks P5 of 10 on outright single-lap pace.
🛡️
Maxx Class P4
P4 of 5 in the Maxx class. Class winner: Force Phantom (392 laps). Closing the class gap is the next-round target.
📊
Championship P7
Round 2 added 119 race points; sitting P7 in the SEKQLD 2026 championship with 241 total after two rounds.
Inference Limits

Likely Race Shape

The public dataset supports a strong read on Project 5FIVE3's pace profile, but not the exact operational choices behind it.

🔄
Disruption-Heavy Profile
A 11.45s gap between best and estimated average lap suggests multiple long pit windows, drive-throughs, or off-pace phases stretching the average. The timing trace doesn't decompose them, but the spread points at recurring slow phases.
📉
Extended Slow Periods
P8 consistency rank suggests one or more extended slow windows beyond the mandatory stops. The timing data shows the impact but not the cause.
👀
What To Watch Next
Round 3 at Ipswich is a 1-day Twilight format on a different track. Project 5FIVE3's recovery potential will depend on which of Round 2's race-shape factors carry over and which were event-specific.
Round 2 Navigation

Round 2 Team Selector

Choose any team below to stay inside the Warwick round context and compare reports side by side. Use the round pills to jump back to Round 1.

#66 Force Phantom #787 ShapeCUT Racing #64 Alpha Racing Team #95 Project 5FIVE3 #42 GF Motorsports #397 CASA Racing #73 Twomota Racing Development #00 Adrenalin Sports #3 Team Fange #49 BR Motorsport
Round 2 Team Hub → Full Field Analysis → Detailed BR Race Report →