family=DM+Sans:wght@400;500;600display=swap" rel="stylesheet">
Team #397 · Sportsman · Timing-Based Team Analysis

CASA
Racing

Warwick — Round 2
26 April 2026 6-Hour Endurance 1.03 km Circuit Warwick Kart Club Data: MYLAPS Speedhive
Finish Position
2nd
of 10 teams · Sportsman
Best Lap
50.410s
Lap 39 · P4 in field
Total Laps
385
7 laps behind leader
Race Time
6:01:52
143 championship pts
Race Results

Overall Classification

Final race classification for SEKQLD Round 2 at Warwick. 10 teams contested the 6-hour endurance race. CASA Racing finished 2nd with 385 laps.

SEKQLD Round 2 final race classification
Pos#TeamTotal TimeLapsBest LapGap
1#66Force Phantom FASTEST LAP6:01:19.26239250.021s—
2#397CASA Racing6:01:52.50038550.410s7 laps
3#787ShapeCUT Racing6:01:46.45738251.234s10 laps
4#73Twomota Racing Development6:01:56.73038250.601s10 laps
5#00Adrenalin Sports6:01:33.44038150.698s11 laps
6#64Alpha Racing Team6:02:05.66937050.525s22 laps
7#3Team Fange6:01:30.41036751.889s25 laps
8#95Project 5FIVE36:02:03.50635150.438s41 laps
9#42GF Motorsports6:02:02.64834750.110s45 laps
10#49BR Motorsport6:01:57.56025950.068s133 laps
Pre-Race Pace

Sunday Practice

Round 2 ran without a separate qualifying session, so Sunday morning's practice is the closest read on relative pace heading into the race. CASA Racing sat P7 on the practice timing sheet.

SEKQLD Round 2 Sunday practice timing
Pos#TeamClassLapsBest LapGap
1#66Force PhantomMaxx3350.333s—
2#49BR MotorsportSportsman1350.875s+00.542s
3#95Project 5FIVE3Maxx2551.236s+00.903s
4#64Alpha Racing TeamMaxx3151.470s+01.137s
5#00Adrenalin SportsSportsman2751.626s+01.293s
6#42GF MotorsportsMaxx2151.758s+01.425s
7#397CASA RacingSportsman2251.825s+01.492s
8#73Twomota Racing DevelopmentSportsman1852.569s+02.236s
9#787ShapeCUT RacingMaxx1052.836s+02.503s
10#3Team FangSportsman1454.607s+04.274s
Pace Analysis

Pace Profile

Comparing each team's fastest single lap against their estimated average lap time. A smaller gap between best and average indicates more consistent pace throughout the 6-hour race.

#397 CASA Racing
50.410s
56.396s
#66 Force Phantom
50.021s
55.304s
#49 BR Motorsport
50.068s
83.852s
#42 GF Motorsports
50.110s
62.601s
#95 Project 5FIVE3
50.438s
61.890s
#64 Alpha Racing Team
50.525s
58.718s
#73 Twomota Racing Development
50.601s
56.850s
#00 Adrenalin Sports
50.698s
56.938s
#787 ShapeCUT Racing
51.234s
56.823s
#3 Team Fange
51.889s
59.102s
Best Lap Estimated Average Lap
Insights

Key Takeaways

Timing-based insights for CASA Racing inferred from public Rd 2 practice, race, and points data.

🔼
Gained 5 Positions
Practice pace ranked CASA Racing P7; the team finished P2 after six hours of racing — turning practice form into race-day position gains.
⚡
P4 Best Lap
Best lap of 50.410s ranked P4 of 10 for outright single-lap pace.
📊
Consistency: P3
Gap between best and estimated average lap: 5.99s. Ranked 3rd of 10 teams for race consistency. Lower gap = fewer disruptions and steadier pace.
🏆
143 Championship Points
Sitting P2 in the Round 2 standings (143 race points). Class: Sportsman.
Timing-Based Read

Data-Inferred Report

This page is inferred from public timing only. Without pit-stop, driver, fuel, or incident logs, the notes below describe likely race patterns rather than confirmed team decisions.

High-confidence timing read: CASA Racing closed Round 2 on the podium with a P4 best-lap rank and P3 consistency rank. The combination of single-lap speed and steady race-long pace is what stands out from the timing trace.

Practice → Flag
P7 → P2
Gained 5 places between Sunday practice and the chequered flag.
Consistency Rank
P3
5.99s separated best from estimated average lap — ranked 3rd of 10 teams.
Best-Lap Rank
P4
Best lap of 50.410s, 4th fastest of 10 entries on outright pace.
🥉
Podium Composition
CASA Racing finished P2 despite being P4 on outright lap-time pace and P3 on consistency. Podium-winning races usually balance both — the timing sheet shows where CASA Racing struck that balance.
⏱️
Outright Lap-Time Window
Best lap of 50.410s on lap 39 sits 4th in the field. With 10 teams scoring an estimated average lap, CASA Racing ranks P2 on long-run pace.
📊
Stint Steadiness
Estimated average lap of 56.396s implies 5.99s of slip from peak to typical lap. P3 consistency rank — inside the top half of the field.
🔢
Lap Count Read
Total laps: 385. 7 laps off the leader. Lap-count gaps in 6-hour racing are a stronger predictor of result than headline best-lap times.
Field Comparison

Where The Podium Came From

The timing data does not expose pit strategy or traffic context, but it does show where CASA Racing sat against the field around them on race day.

🥈
Vs Force Phantom
Force Phantom finished P1 on 392 laps, 7 laps ahead. Best laps: 50.021s vs CASA Racing's 50.410s. The classification gap is the cleanest read on race-day separation.
🎯
Vs Race Leader (#66)
Race winner Force Phantom finished 7 laps ahead with a best lap of 50.021s. CASA Racing's best of 50.410s ranks P4 of 10 on outright single-lap pace.
🏆
Sportsman Class Winner
Topped the Sportsman class with 385 laps, the highest finisher among 5 Sportsman-class entries. Class win is the headline of the day.
📊
Championship P4
Round 2 added 143 race points; sitting P4 in the SEKQLD 2026 championship with 268 total after two rounds.
Inference Limits

Likely Race Shape

The public dataset supports a strong read on CASA Racing's pace profile, but not the exact operational choices behind it.

🔄
Disruption-Heavy Profile
A 5.99s gap between best and estimated average lap suggests multiple long pit windows, drive-throughs, or off-pace phases stretching the average. The timing trace doesn't decompose them, but the spread points at recurring slow phases.
📊
Few Extended Slow Windows
P3 consistency rank puts CASA Racing among the steadiest teams in the field. Few signs of unscheduled slow phases beyond the standard mandatory stops.
👀
What To Watch Next
On this form, the next round at Ipswich (30 May, 1-day Twilight format) will be a question of whether CASA Racing can replicate the front-running execution on a different track and shorter format.
Round 2 Navigation

Round 2 Team Selector

Choose any team below to stay inside the Warwick round context and compare reports side by side. Use the round pills to jump back to Round 1.

#66 Force Phantom #787 ShapeCUT Racing #64 Alpha Racing Team #95 Project 5FIVE3 #42 GF Motorsports #397 CASA Racing #73 Twomota Racing Development #00 Adrenalin Sports #3 Team Fange #49 BR Motorsport
Round 2 Team Hub → Full Field Analysis → Detailed BR Race Report →