Team #42 · Sportsman · Timing-Based Team Analysis

GF
Motorsports

Cooloola — Round 1

15 March 2026 6-Hour Endurance 0.89 km Circuit Cooloola Coast Kart Club Data: MYLAPS Speedhive

Finish Position

4th

of 8 teams · Sportsman

Best Lap

43.490s

— P6 in field

Total Laps

466

10 laps behind leader

Race Time

6:01:09

132 championship pts

Race Results

Overall Classification

Final race classification for SEKQLD Round 1 at Cooloola. 8 teams completed the 6-hour endurance race. GF Motorsports finished 4th with 466 laps.

SEKQLD Round 1 final race classification
Pos	#	Team	Total Time	Laps	Best Lap	Gap
1	#66	Force Phantom	6:00:52.771	476	42.820s	—
2	#64	Alpha Racing Team	6:01:02.254	474	43.121s	2 laps
3	#787	ShapeCUT Racing	6:01:09.264	469	42.996s	7 laps
4	#42	GF Motorsports	6:01:09.050	466	43.490s	10 laps
5	#49	BR Motorsport FASTEST LAP	6:01:16.551	466	42.815s	10 laps
6	#397	CASA Racing	6:01:18.384	460	43.628s	16 laps
7	#95	Project 5FIVE3	6:01:02.174	458	43.122s	18 laps
8	#00	Team Fang (Come'n'Try)	6:01:06.071	414	44.396s	62 laps

Qualifying

Grid Position

GF Motorsports qualified P5, +00.596s off pole. Qualifying determines the starting order for the 6-hour race.

SEKQLD Round 1 qualifying results
Pos	#	Team	Class	Laps	Best Lap	Gap
1	#66	Force Phantom	Maxx	13	42.920s	—
2	#49	BR Motorsport	Sportsman	11	43.178s	+00.258s
3	#64	Alpha Racing Team	Maxx	14	43.191s	+00.271s
4	#95	Project 5FIVE3	Maxx	13	43.322s	+00.402s
5	#42	GF Motorsports	Sportsman	13	43.516s	+00.596s
6	#787	ShapeCUT Racing	Maxx	13	43.521s	+00.601s
7	#397	CASA Racing	Sportsman	13	44.065s	+01.145s
8	#00	Team Fang (Come'n'Try)	Sportsman	11	45.002s	+02.082s

Pace Analysis

Pace Profile

Comparing each team's fastest single lap against their estimated average lap time. A smaller gap between best and average indicates more consistent pace throughout the 6-hour race.

#49 BR Motorsport

42.815s

46.516s

#66 Force Phantom

42.820s

45.489s

#787 ShapeCUT Racing

42.996s

46.203s

#64 Alpha Racing Team

43.121s

45.701s

#95 Project 5FIVE3

43.122s

47.297s

#42 GF Motorsports

43.490s

46.500s

#397 CASA Racing

43.628s

47.127s

#00 Team Fang

44.396s

52.334s

Best Lap Estimated Average Lap

Insights

Key Takeaways

Timing-based insights for GF Motorsports inferred from public Rd 1 qualifying, race, and points data.

📈

Gained Positions

Qualified P5 but finished the race P4 — gained 1 position during the 6-hour endurance race.

⚡

P6 Best Lap

Best lap of 43.490s was 0.675s off the field fastest (42.815s). Ranked 6th for single-lap pace across all teams.

📊

Consistency: P3

Gap between best lap and estimated average: 3.01s. Ranked 3rd out of 8 teams for race consistency. Lower gap = fewer disruptions and steadier pace.

🏆

132 Championship Points

Sitting P4 overall in the championship after Round 1. Class: Sportsman.

Timing-Based Read

Data-Inferred Report

This page is inferred from public timing only. Without pit-stop, driver, fuel, or incident logs, the notes below describe likely race patterns rather than confirmed team decisions.

High-confidence timing read: GF Motorsports built one of the most efficient races in the field. They were only sixth on outright best lap, yet finished fourth overall and best of the Sportsman runners through superior long-run retention.

Qualifying Delta

P5 → P4

GF improved one position across the race and became the top Sportsman finisher.

Consistency Rank

A 3.01s best-to-average gap placed them behind only Alpha and Force Phantom for long-run stability.

Closest Rival Gap

+7.5s

They beat BR Motorsport on the same lap count, which means the margin came from small gains accumulated all day.

🏁

Sportsman Benchmark

GF Motorsports finished P4 overall as the top Sportsman entry while matching BR Motorsport's 466-lap total. That is one of the strongest over-achievements relative to outright lap-time ranking.

📊

Execution Over Peak Pace

Their best lap ranked only P6, but consistency ranked P3 and estimated average lap ranked P4. The data suggests this result came from staying in the fight every stint rather than producing isolated standout laps.

⚖️

Closest Battle

GF and BR finished on the same lap count, with GF classified ahead by final-lap timing. Even though BR had 0.675s more outright pace on best lap, GF's average lap was fractionally better by about 0.016s.

🧱

Lower-Drama Pace

With an estimated average lap of 46.500s, GF was slower at peak than several Maxx teams but steadier than ShapeCUT, BR, CASA, Project 5FIVE3, and Team Fang. In endurance racing, that steadiness often matters more than raw headline pace.

Field Comparison

How GF Beat Faster Teams

GF Motorsports finished ahead of teams that looked quicker in single-lap pace. That is where the timing profile becomes especially interesting.

🔶

Vs BR Motorsport

BR was 0.675s quicker on best lap, yet GF still finished ahead on elapsed time with identical laps completed. That strongly suggests GF lost less time in the slow portions of the event.

🌊

Vs CASA Racing

CASA's best lap was only 0.138s slower than GF, but the average-lap spread widened to more than 0.6s and the result gap became 6 laps. GF's class lead appears to have come from superior retention over distance.

📌

Vs Maxx Podium

GF could not match Force Phantom, Alpha, or ShapeCUT on outright speed, but they finished much closer than the best-lap table alone would predict. That is often the signature of a well-managed endurance race without major setbacks.

🏆

Points Position

GF leaves Round 1 fourth overall on 132 points and first in Sportsman. Timing alone says they already own the class benchmark and are close enough to outright leaders to punish mistakes above them.

Inference Limits

Likely Race Pattern

The public data does not reveal exactly why GF's race held together so well, but it does indicate where the strength most likely sat.

🔄

Clean Operational Rhythm

A top-three consistency score usually points to fewer extended slow segments. That may reflect efficient fuel stops, smoother driver changes, better traffic handling, or some mix of all three.

📉

Minimal Pace Collapse

GF's timing profile does not look like a team that suffered a major race-shaping issue. The numbers instead suggest a steady accumulation of small wins over rivals whose pace was quicker but more volatile.

🎯

What Unlocks More

If GF can hold this level of consistency while finding a few tenths of extra outright pace, they become more than a class benchmark. The Round 1 numbers already show an endurance foundation strong enough to threaten bigger results.

Round 1 Navigation

Round 1 Team Selector

Choose any team below to stay inside the Cooloola round context and compare reports side by side.

#66 Force Phantom #64 Alpha Racing Team #787 ShapeCUT Racing #42 GF Motorsports #49 BR Motorsport #397 CASA Racing #95 Project 5FIVE3 #00 Team Fang

Round 1 Team Hub → Full Field Analysis →

GFMotorsports

Overall Classification

Grid Position

Pace Profile

Key Takeaways

Data-Inferred Report

How GF Beat Faster Teams

Likely Race Pattern

Round 1 Team Selector

GF
Motorsports