Team #66 · Maxx · Timing-Based Team Analysis

Force
Phantom

Cooloola — Round 1

15 March 2026 6-Hour Endurance 0.89 km Circuit Cooloola Coast Kart Club Data: MYLAPS Speedhive

Finish Position

1st

of 8 teams · Maxx

Best Lap

42.820s

— P2 in field

Total Laps

476

Race leader

Race Time

6:00:52

151 championship pts

Race Results

Overall Classification

Final race classification for SEKQLD Round 1 at Cooloola. 8 teams completed the 6-hour endurance race. Force Phantom finished 1st with 476 laps.

SEKQLD Round 1 final race classification
Pos	#	Team	Total Time	Laps	Best Lap	Gap
1	#66	Force Phantom	6:00:52.771	476	42.820s	—
2	#64	Alpha Racing Team	6:01:02.254	474	43.121s	2 laps
3	#787	ShapeCUT Racing	6:01:09.264	469	42.996s	7 laps
4	#42	GF Motorsports	6:01:09.050	466	43.490s	10 laps
5	#49	BR Motorsport FASTEST LAP	6:01:16.551	466	42.815s	10 laps
6	#397	CASA Racing	6:01:18.384	460	43.628s	16 laps
7	#95	Project 5FIVE3	6:01:02.174	458	43.122s	18 laps
8	#00	Team Fang (Come'n'Try)	6:01:06.071	414	44.396s	62 laps

Qualifying

Grid Position

Force Phantom qualified P1 on pole position. Qualifying determines the starting order for the 6-hour race.

SEKQLD Round 1 qualifying results
Pos	#	Team	Class	Laps	Best Lap	Gap
1	#66	Force Phantom	Maxx	13	42.920s	—
2	#49	BR Motorsport	Sportsman	11	43.178s	+00.258s
3	#64	Alpha Racing Team	Maxx	14	43.191s	+00.271s
4	#95	Project 5FIVE3	Maxx	13	43.322s	+00.402s
5	#42	GF Motorsports	Sportsman	13	43.516s	+00.596s
6	#787	ShapeCUT Racing	Maxx	13	43.521s	+00.601s
7	#397	CASA Racing	Sportsman	13	44.065s	+01.145s
8	#00	Team Fang (Come'n'Try)	Sportsman	11	45.002s	+02.082s

Pace Analysis

Pace Profile

Comparing each team's fastest single lap against their estimated average lap time. A smaller gap between best and average indicates more consistent pace throughout the 6-hour race.

#49 BR Motorsport

42.815s

46.516s

#66 Force Phantom

42.820s

45.489s

#787 ShapeCUT Racing

42.996s

46.203s

#64 Alpha Racing Team

43.121s

45.701s

#95 Project 5FIVE3

43.122s

47.297s

#42 GF Motorsports

43.490s

46.500s

#397 CASA Racing

43.628s

47.127s

#00 Team Fang

44.396s

52.334s

Best Lap Estimated Average Lap

Insights

Key Takeaways

Timing-based insights for Force Phantom inferred from public Rd 1 qualifying, race, and points data.

🎯

Held Position

Qualified P1 and finished P1 — maintained grid position throughout the 6-hour race.

⚡

P2 Best Lap

Best lap of 42.820s was 0.005s off the field fastest (42.815s). Ranked 2nd for single-lap pace across all teams.

📊

Consistency: P2

Gap between best lap and estimated average: 2.67s. Ranked 2nd out of 8 teams for race consistency. Lower gap = fewer disruptions and steadier pace.

🏆

151 Championship Points

Sitting P1 overall in the championship after Round 1 (150 race + 1 bonus). Class: Maxx.

Timing-Based Read

Data-Inferred Report

This page is inferred from public timing only. Without pit-stop, driver, fuel, or incident logs, the notes below describe likely race patterns rather than confirmed team decisions.

High-confidence timing read: Force Phantom combined pole position, the race win, the best estimated average lap in the field, and the second-fastest outright lap. Even without operational logs, the public data points to the most complete end-to-end execution of the day.

Grid To Flag

P1 → P1

No recovery drive required. Their race was built from control rather than comeback pressure.

Consistency Rank

Only 2.67s separated best and estimated average lap, second only to Alpha Racing Team.

Peak Pace Gap

+0.005s

They were effectively equal to BR Motorsport on outright one-lap speed while still winning by 10 laps.

🏁

Winning Pattern

Pole position, race win, and 476 laps give Force Phantom the cleanest race shape in the field. The timing suggests they spent the event managing an advantage instead of chasing one.

⏱️

Margin Over Peak Speed

BR Motorsport owned the single fastest lap by 0.005s, but Force Phantom still finished 10 laps clear of BR. That gap strongly suggests repeatable long-run pace outweighed headline lap-time peaks.

📊

Benchmark Average

Their estimated average lap of 45.489s was the quickest in the field, 0.212s faster than Alpha and just over 1.0s faster than BR. Over six hours, that sort of margin compounds into track position security.

🧭

No Recovery Required

Unlike ShapeCUT, Alpha, or GF, Force Phantom did not need to outperform their qualifying slot to reach the podium. The race appears to have been about protecting a benchmark rather than correcting an early deficit.

Field Comparison

Where The Win Came From

The timing data does not expose pit strategy or traffic context, but it does show where Force Phantom separated itself from the direct fight around them.

🥇

Vs Alpha Racing Team

Alpha was actually the most consistent team on the best-to-average metric, yet still finished 2 laps down. That points to Force Phantom carrying slightly stronger pace at the front end of the lap-time range often enough to keep the buffer intact.

⚔️

Vs ShapeCUT And BR

ShapeCUT and BR both showed competitive peak pace, but neither matched Force Phantom's full-race output. The winner's advantage looks less like a one-lap edge and more like fewer costly slow phases across the entire event.

🛡️

Vs Class Rivals

Within Maxx, Force Phantom finished ahead of Alpha, ShapeCUT and Project 5FIVE3. Winning that class group while also topping the outright result reinforces how complete the race execution was.

🏆

Championship Position

Round 1 leaves them first in points with 151. On timing alone, they now look like the reference team others must either out-qualify or out-stabilise over a full six-hour run.

Inference Limits

Likely Race Shape

The public dataset supports a strong read on Force Phantom's pace profile, but not the exact operational choices behind it.

🔄

Stable Stop Cycles

Because the average-lap performance stayed so strong, the likely interpretation is that fuel stops, driver changes, and re-entry laps were managed with minimal time leakage. The timing cannot prove that sequence, but it is the most consistent explanation.

📉

Few Extended Slow Windows

Nothing in the public numbers suggests a major collapse phase. Teams with poorer average-lap retention often show signs of repeated interruption; Force Phantom's profile suggests fewer or shorter unstable periods.

👀

What To Watch Next

If rivals close the gap later in the season, the likely battleground will be race management rather than outright pace. Force Phantom already proved they have enough one-lap speed; the bigger value was how often they stayed near it.

Round 1 Navigation

Round 1 Team Selector

Choose any team below to stay inside the Cooloola round context and compare reports side by side.

#66 Force Phantom #64 Alpha Racing Team #787 ShapeCUT Racing #42 GF Motorsports #49 BR Motorsport #397 CASA Racing #95 Project 5FIVE3 #00 Team Fang

Round 1 Team Hub → Full Field Analysis →

ForcePhantom

Overall Classification

Grid Position

Pace Profile

Key Takeaways

Data-Inferred Report

Where The Win Came From

Likely Race Shape

Round 1 Team Selector

Force
Phantom